PFAS is a family, not a single chemical. It stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — thousands of man-made chemicals (the U.S. Geological Survey puts the count at more than 12,000) used since the 1940s because they repel water, oil, and grease and resist heat. The two you’ve heard of are PFOA and PFOS. They’re the most studied, and they earned the nickname “forever chemicals” for a simple reason: they barely break down — in the environment or in you.
You can’t see them, taste them, or smell them in water. The levels we’re talking about are parts per trillion. One part per trillion is roughly one drop in an Olympic-size swimming pool.
Where it comes from
PFAS went into nonstick cookware, food packaging, waterproof clothing, stain-resistant carpet and furniture, and firefighting foam used at airports and military bases. Factories that made or used them, landfills, and wastewater all release them. From there they move into soil and groundwater and stay there.
This isn’t a one-town problem. In a nationwide USGS study (tap water from 716 locations, sampled 2016–2021), scientists estimated that at least one PFAS could be detected in about 45% of U.S. tap water — public supplies and private wells at similar rates. That study tested for 32 PFAS. It doesn’t mean your tap has them, and it doesn’t tell you your level. It means testing is the only way to know.
The health picture, honestly
Here’s what the federal health agencies actually say, without the scare headline. The CDC’s Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) finds associations between higher exposure to certain PFAS and: increased cholesterol, lower antibody response to vaccines in children, small decreases in birth weight, pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia, changes in liver enzymes, and increased risk of kidney and testicular cancer (strongest for PFOA).
Two honest qualifiers. First, “associated with” comes mostly from studies of higher exposures — workers and communities near contaminated sites — and risk at the low levels in most tap water is still being worked out. Second, a cancer hazard label tells you something can cause harm; it doesn’t tell you your risk from a given glass of water. Dose and years of exposure matter.
What EPA did with that science: in April 2024 it set the first national drinking water limits — a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 4.0 parts per trillion each for PFOA and PFOS, with a health goal (MCLG) of zero. That zero goal is EPA saying no level is known to be risk-free; 4 ppt is the enforceable line, set at the lowest level treatment can reliably hit. Public systems must complete initial monitoring by 2027 and, under the original rule, install treatment by 2029 where they exceed the limits. (EPA has since proposed extending that treatment deadline to 2031 — still a proposal, not final.) Private wells aren’t regulated at all: if you have a well, testing and treatment are on you.
How to test
On city water, start free: check your utility’s annual water quality report, ask the utility directly, or search EPA’s PFAS monitoring database for your system.
If you need your own number — especially on a well — use a state-certified lab running EPA Method 533 or 537.1. Expect a few hundred dollars per sample. PFAS sampling is fussy: the chemicals are in cosmetics, waterproof jackets, and fast-food wrappers, and sloppy sampling contaminates the sample. Follow the lab’s instructions exactly — gloves on, no personal-care products that morning, only the containers they send you. Cheap dip strips do not exist for PFAS at parts-per-trillion levels; anyone selling one is selling you a guess.
What actually removes it
EPA names three technologies that work. The filter has to be certified for PFAS specifically — look for NSF/ANSI 53 (carbon and ion-exchange units) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) with a PFOA/PFOS or “Total PFAS” reduction claim, and confirm the exact model in the certifier’s listing (NSF, IAPMO, WQA, UL, or CSA).
- Reverse osmosis (RO). Forces water through a membrane that PFAS can’t cross. Broadest coverage, including short-chain PFAS that carbon struggles with. Usually one tap — your kitchen sink. This is the safest bet when you don’t know which PFAS you have (and most people don’t).
- Granular activated carbon / carbon block (GAC). Traps PFAS as water passes through. Works well on long-chain PFOA and PFOS; weaker on short-chain compounds. One honest catch EPA flags: as of April 2024, certification testing wasn’t yet aligned to the new 4 ppt standard, so a certified filter reduces PFAS — it may not promise “below 4 ppt.” Reduction still lowers exposure, which is the point.
- Anion exchange resin. Charged beads pull PFAS out of the water. Strong performer, often in whole-house or professional systems.
Maintenance is not optional with any of these. An exhausted carbon filter stops working silently — set a replacement reminder the day you install it.
What does NOT remove it:
- Boiling. PFAS are not destroyed by boiling; you can concentrate them as water evaporates.
- A basic sediment filter or a standard water softener. A softener swaps hardness minerals; that’s different chemistry from the anion exchange above.
- Any pitcher, faucet, or fridge filter that isn’t certified for PFAS reduction. Many fridge filters are certified only for chlorine taste and odor. If the listing doesn’t claim PFAS, assume it doesn’t touch them.
- Letting water sit. PFAS don’t evaporate or settle out.
What I’d buy
Treatment type: an under-sink reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 for PFAS reduction, treating the one tap you drink and cook from. It’s the broadest, most forgiving choice when your exact PFAS mix is unknown. If a certified lab test shows only low PFOA/PFOS and budget decides it, an NSF/ANSI 53-certified carbon block filter is a reasonable second choice — with filter changes on schedule, no exceptions.
The bottom line
PFAS is a real contaminant with a real federal limit now — 4 parts per trillion — and real filters that reduce it. It’s also a contaminant where your actual risk depends on your actual level, which nobody can guess from a headline. Test first, then buy the certified treatment that matches the result.
Start here: What’s In Your Water? — learn how to read your water report and test your own tap.
One member of the PFAS family deserves its own article: TFA, the smallest of the forever chemicals, which forms in the atmosphere and falls with the rain. Researchers at NJIT found it in more than 91% of the New Jersey tap water samples they screened. Read the full story: TFA in Drinking Water: The PFAS That Falls From the Sky.
October 2026 Update: PFAS in 91% of New Jersey Waterways Tested
A report released this month by the Environment New Jersey Research & Policy Center and Frontier Group — PFAS in America’s Rivers and Lakes — pulled together federal testing data from the EPA’s Water Quality Portal, from samples collected between 2022 and 2024. In New Jersey, PFAS turned up at 78 of the 86 waterway locations tested — 91% — with as many as 20 different PFAS compounds found across the state. In the Raritan River watershed, every location with data came back positive, and all of them sit upstream of the drinking water intake at Bridgewater.
Read the headline the way a lab would: this testing was of rivers, streams, and lakes — the source water — not finished tap water. Nobody tested 86 kitchen taps. What the number actually tells you is that the water arriving at treatment plants across New Jersey carries PFAS in it — and what reaches your glass depends on how well your utility removes it.
The standards show why removal matters. New Jersey’s own drinking water limits — the first in the nation — allow PFOA at 14 parts per trillion, PFOS at 13, and PFNA at 13. The federal EPA limits are tighter: 4 parts per trillion each for PFOA and PFOS. Same chemicals, two different yardsticks — and the federal one is the stricter.
The home answer hasn’t changed: granular activated carbon, reverse osmosis, and ion exchange are the proven tools — and a water test tells you which one your home actually needs.
New Jersey’s Drinking Water Ranks #2 — for the Wrong Reason
The waterways are only half the picture. An analysis by ABC’s data journalism team, reported by WABC (ABC7) in its Our America: Trouble on Tap investigation, found that New Jersey is the number 2 state in the country for contamination of its drinking water with certain PFAS chemicals. That ranking is about drinking water itself — the treated water in public systems — not just the rivers and reservoirs it comes from.
New Jersey didn’t wait for Washington to act. The state adopted its own enforceable PFAS limits — for PFNA in 2018, and for PFOA and PFOS in 2020 — years before the federal drinking-water standards existed. A #2 ranking is exactly why those early rules matter, and why testing your own tap is still the only way to know what’s in your glass.
And the Reported Numbers May Be Half the Real Ones
A study published October 23, 2026 in Cell Reports Sustainability (Texas Christian University) modeled more than 1.8 million PFAS test records from the EPA’s national monitoring data. Here’s the trick in the official numbers: when a result comes back below the lab’s minimum reporting level, it’s usually counted as zero — and 98% of results fall below that line. The model estimates that counting them as zero captures only about 44% of the average PFAS concentration across nearly 10,000 community water systems. For the six PFAS the EPA actually regulates, the reported national average is about 2.6 parts per trillion; the modeled estimate is 5.2 — double.
The researchers are careful, and I’ll be too: this is about how the numbers get summarized, not proof that every below-limit result is a health risk. But remember what “not detected” really means — below the reporting limit, not zero. It’s one more reason the test of your own tap beats the headline average.
Update — October 24, 2026: Pennsylvania Bans PFAS Firefighting Foam
Pennsylvania just acted on one of the biggest PFAS sources of all: firefighting foam. On October 22, Governor Shapiro signed a new law (Senate Bill 804, now Act 98 of 2026) that bans the manufacture, sale, and distribution of PFAS-containing Class B firefighting foam starting July 1, 2027, and bans its use starting January 1, 2028, with narrow exceptions for places like airports and refineries. Fire departments can also get grant help to safely dispose of the foam they already have.
The timing is no accident. A recent report from the PennEnvironment Research & Policy Center found PFAS in 96% of Pennsylvania rivers and streams tested — and 91% of the ones tested right here in New Jersey. Foam sprayed at airports, military bases, and training grounds washes into the ground and stays there: one tire fire in Sellersville, Pennsylvania, back in 1986 left local wells contaminated for decades. Cutting off the source is how the numbers in our water finally start coming down — and one more reason to know exactly what your filter is certified to remove.
Federal Funding Update — October 2026
On October 22, 2026, Rep. Laura Gillen (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) introduced the Protect Clean Water Act, a bipartisan bill that would authorize $10 billion over five years for PFAS and other emerging-contaminant projects, delivered through the Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds — the state programs that lend and grant money to local water and wastewater systems. The bill would replace the $5 billion the 2021 infrastructure law provided for the same work, which expired at the end of fiscal 2026. The American Water Works Association estimates that PFAS treatment for drinking water alone could cost $2.7 billion to $3.5 billion a year; without federal help, those costs land in local water bills. One caution: an authorization is a ceiling, not a check. The bill has only been introduced, and Congress would still have to appropriate the money before a single dollar reaches a water system.